Our Research

Discover our recent findings, catch up with news, and review in-depth resources.

Introduction to Pharmacokinetics

An understanding of the characteristics of drug exposure following administration and how it relates to safety and efficacy is critical for progressing drug development (e.g. in decision making for drug candidates…

The Role of OGNTs in the Personalized Medicine Revolution

This paper highlights oligonucleotides (OGNTs) as a revolutionary new class of drugs in personalized medicine due to their targeted approach to genetic diseases.

Single-Day Protein LC-MS Bioanalysis

This paper explains how next-generation trypsins offer faster protein digestion for LC-MS analysis with comparable performance to standard methods.

In Vitro Models for Predicting Transporter-Mediated DDIs

This paper discusses how in vitro studies can be used to predict drug-drug interactions (DDIs) caused by transporters in the body.

A Singlicate Immunogenicity Method to Detect anti-PEG Antibodies

This paper proposes a new method to detect anti-PEG antibodies in serum, potentially improving the safety of PEG-based medications.

Development and Validation of Immunogenicity Assays for ADCs

CASE STUDY – DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF IMMUNOGENICITY ASSAYS FOR ADCs. Addressing ADC Regulatory Challenges by Providing Validated Assays for Multi-Domain Proteins…
Scroll to Top

Challenges of Developing an ADA Assay for Bispecific Antibody Therapeutics and ADA Characterization

CASE STUDY – ADA ASSAYS

Bispecifics (Bs) are biopharmaceutical products that bind to two different targets (epitopes). These are mainly two types: IgG-like (antibodies Abs) and non-IgG-like which include Bites (bispecific T-cell engager) and DARTs (Dual-affinity Re-targeting Antibody).

There are currently over 100 BsAbs at various stage of clinical trials and three BsAbs with different modes of action have been approved.

Challenges

There are a number of challenges in the development and validation of immunogenicity assays (ADA assays) for bispecifics.

  1. Bispecifics need immunogenicity assays including characterization against the individual domains as per regulatory requirement
  2. It is important to have the right tools (positive control (PC) and monospecific or domain-specific “drugs” to characterize)
  3. Validation is more complicated and time/resource consuming than for a standard monoclonal antibody therapeutic (mAb)
  4. Data is interpreted for ADA against whole molecule and each of the domains

Required tools

Bi-specific confirmatory approach.

FDA 2019 Guidance (Section IV.A.3)

  • An immune response to one domain may inhibit a specific function while leaving other intact. Direct initial screening and confirmatory tests against the whole therapeutic protein product recommended
  • Examination of immune responses… such as bispecifics and ADCs may require development of multiple assays to measure immune responses to different domains of the molecules

EMA 2017 Guideline (Section 7.4)

  • A strategy…to dissect the specificities of the antibodies to individual moieties may be used

Bispecific ADA tiered approach

Immunogenicity assay approach for multi-domain proteins

 

Goal

The customer’s drug was a BsAb and they required an ADA assay to include domain-specific characterization.

Our solution

The customer was able to provide suitable positive controls against both arms of the bispecific along with versions of mono-specific drugs for each of the arms of the BsAbs.

We utilised the tools provided and our scientists, who have a wide range of expertise in development and validation of ADA assays, provided a solution.

Our process

Using a bridging assay format with acid pre-treatment to improve drug tolerance, DDS developed a screening assay and three different confirmatory assays. The ADA response was characterized against the whole drug, and against each of the monospecific drug arms.

Single vs bispecific (Plates)

Total number of plates:

Single domain assay: ~42 plates

Bispecific domain assay: ~106 plates

Results

The validated assays will support sample analysis throughout the method lifecycle.

The customer is assured that regulatory requirements for a sensitive, selective, specific and drug tolerant assay have been met in order to support submissions.

Zhiyang Zhao, Ph.D.

Chief Scientific Officer

Zhiyang Zhao, Ph.D., serves as Chief Scientific Officer (CSO) at Resolian. Dr. Zhao has over 30 years of pharmaceutical industry experience with special focus on drug metabolism and bioanalysis of small and large molecules in drug discovery and development. Dr. Zhao has previously held positions at Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, and Amgen. Before joining Resolian in 2015, Dr. Zhao served as Site Director of Preclinical Research at Amgen in Cambridge, Massachusetts, for over a decade. 

Currently, Dr. Zhao serves as an Adjunct Professor at the Eshelman School of Pharmacy of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, and as Editor-in-Chief of Drug Metabolism & Bioanalysis Letters, a journal by Bentham Science, which publishes in all areas of drug metabolism and bioanalysis. Dr. Zhao received his Ph.D. degree in Medicinal Chemistry from Virginia Polytechnic and State University (popularly known as Virginia Tech) in Blacksburg, Virginia. 

Patrick Bennett

Chief Executive Officer

Patrick Bennett has over 35 years of experience in pharmaceutical analysis and laboratory management. Now Chief Business Officer at Resolian, Patrick’s experience includes the roles of Strategic Marketing Director for Pharma with Thermo Fisher Scientific, LabCorp, and Vice President of Strategy and Development with PPD. 

Patrick earned a B.S. degree in Toxicology and a M.S. degree in Pharmacology from the College of Pharmacy and Allied Health at St. John’s University and an M.B.A in International Marketing from the Martin J. Whitman School of Management at Syracuse University.